CBC FINAL EXAM (2008)
Each Multiple Choice Answer is worth 2 POINTS
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
ANSWER:
a) Both have ‘Use it or Lose it ‘ rules
b) Both are initially governed under section 105 and 106 as benefit welfare plans
c) Both are subject to COBRA
ANSWER:
TEST CASE INFORMATION SECTION
Each Test Case Answer is worth 2 POINTS
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Current Plan Monthly Premium |
||||||
EE Status |
|
Rate |
Total Premium |
ER Cost |
EE Cost |
|||
Single |
35 |
$ 475.00 |
$ 16,625.00 |
$ 10,806.25 |
$ 5,818.75 |
|||
EE SP |
10 |
$ 845.00 |
$ 8,450.00 |
$ 5,492.50 |
$ 2,957.50 |
|||
EE Chdn |
15 |
$ 750.00 |
$ 11,250.00 |
$ 7,312.50 |
$ 3,937.50 |
|||
Fam |
15 |
$ 1,250.00 |
$ 18,750.00 |
$ 12,187.50 |
$ 6,562.50 |
|||
Totals |
75 |
|
$ 55,075.00 |
$ 35,798.75 |
$ 19,276.25 |
|||
|
|
Proposed Plan Monthly Premium |
|||
EE Status |
|
Rate |
Total Premium |
ER Cost |
EE Cost |
Single |
35 |
$ 285.00 |
$ 9,975.00 |
$ 6,483.75 |
$ 3,491.25 |
EE SP |
10 |
$ 500.00 |
$ 5,000.00 |
$ 3,250.00 |
$ 1,750.00 |
EE Chdn |
15 |
$ 390.00 |
$ 5,850.00 |
$ 3,802.50 |
$ 2,047.50 |
Fam |
15 |
$ 750.00 |
$ 11,250.00 |
$ 7,312.50 |
$ 3,937.50 |
Totals |
75 |
|
$ 32,075.00 |
$ 20,848.75 |
$ 11,226.25 |
Plan A Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Plan |
Renewal |
Current Company |
Total Cost: |
$55,075.00 |
$32,075.00 |
$0.00 |
% Diff/Current: |
|
-41.76% |
-100.00% |
Savings/mo: |
|
$23,000.00 |
$32,075.00 |
Savings/yr: |
|
$276,000.00 |
$384,900.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer Premium Savings |
|
|
|
|
Monthly |
Annual |
|
Current Prem |
$ 35,798.75 |
$ 429,585.00 |
|
Proposed Prem |
$ 20,848.75 |
$ 250,185.00 |
|
ER Savings |
$ 14,950.00 |
$ 179,400.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
The HRA will reimburse 80% after the first $250 deductible = $2200 for Single
The HRA will reimburse 80% after the dependent deductible $250 = $2200 for dependent .
This means the HRA will reimburse $2200 per risk unit.
The shareholders cannot have a tax free HRA so there are 109 risk units for qualified employees.
Employer Premium Savings (no shareholders) |
||
|
Monthly |
Annual |
Current Prem |
$ 33,624.50 |
$ 403,494.00 |
Proposed Prem |
$ 19,548.75 |
$ 234,585.00 |
ER Savings |
$ 14,075.75 |
$ 168,909.00 |
|
|
|
Actual Maximum Exposure to the Plan: |
|||
|
|
|
HRA |
Employer |
Maximum Exposure |
$ 239,800.00 |
|
|
Proposed prem. |
$ 234,585.00 |
|
|
HRA plan costs |
$ 474,385.00 |
|
|
less current prem. |
$ 403,494.00 |
|
|
minimum savings: |
$ (70,891.00) |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Exposure to the Plan: |
|||
Employer |
|
|
|
|
HRA @ 50% utilization |
$ 119,900.00 |
|
|
Proposed prem |
$ 234,585.00 |
|
|
HRA plan costs |
$ 354,485.00 |
|
|
less current prem. |
$ 403,494.00 |
|
|
minimum savings: |
$ 49,009.00 |
|
Group A wants to look at changing their insurance plan to offer options to the employees and save premium dollars. The plan should also be designed to attract and retain employees in the competitive market. They are interested in an HRA and even setting up a dual choice option. Currently the employer pays 65% of the total employee and dependent premiums. They are an S Corp with 2 shareholders being family and 1 shareholder EE + Spouse. They have a Health FSA and there are 20 employees enrolled in it.
The current insurance plan for in network benefits: $250 deductible (3 x family) then 80% coinsurance with $25 DOC and $15/$25/$50 Rx copays. The Deductible and Coinsurance out of pocket is $1500 Single and does not include copays. The family is 3x. The Rate and Census: 35 EE only at $475 / 10 EE + Spouse at $845 / 15 EE + child at $750 / 15 EE + Family at $1250 (Currently there are 4 employees double insured)
The proposed insurance plan for in network benefits: $3000 QHDHP deductible (2x family). The coinsurance is 100% after the deductible. The out of pocket maximum is $3000 single and $6000 family. All prescriptions are applied to the deductible then 100% insured. Preventive care is paid 100% by insurance not applicable to the deductible. The premium rates are: EE only $285 / EE + Spouse $500 / EE + Child $390 / Family $750
CASE STUDY ESSAYS SECTION – PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Each Case Study Essay answer is worth UP TO 10 POINTS
All three case studies must be submitted at the same time. Place the your answer to each case study immediately below the scenario. Being in your email window, the space allowed will expand. Again, should you encounter any technical difficulties, call Art Widen before 9:00 p.m., seven days a week for technical support. (Central Standard Time)
The three cases studies describe actual client/prospect situations. You need to demonstrate, in your analysis and recommendations, a well rounded understanding of the CDHI options and the federal laws and/or rulings governing the plans you recommend. Before you make your recommendation(s), list the information you need to know (ie. I will need to know how many claims exceeded $5,000 in the previous year, etc.). Then, proceed with your recommendation(s) and cite the reasons for that/those recommendation(s) versus any other option you may have recommended (ie. I recommended the HRA vs the non-qualified MSA because) Enter all information immediately below the case information as you had with the multiple choice section of this exam. The space for your answer, of course, will expand to suit the length of your answers. Please be very detailed in your answers. Points will be added (up to 20 points per case study) for detailed explanations and creative approaches.
Case Study # 1
Available Information - You prospect into a 49-employee machine shop that is looking for group medical coverage. Over half of the 49 employees have a difficult time speaking and understanding English. Partly because of that and because the employees tend to want as much protection as they can get, the employer currently has a $500 deductible plan (twenty years ago, the employer had a $100 deductible and, as recently as five years ago, a $250 deductible plan) with 90/10 co-insurance to $5,000, a $20 per OV co-pay and an RX card with co-pays of $10 for generic and $25 for brand-name drugs. The employer is furious about getting a 20% to 40% premium increase seemingly every year. Consequently, the average lifespan of a group medical policy at his company has been about 1.5 years over the past ten years. Due to the rising cost of his insurance, the employer has shifted more and more of the premium burden onto his employees to the point where he now worries about continuing to meet participation requirements. HOW WOULD YOU DEAL WITH THIS SCENARIO? IF YOU RECOMMEND SOME TYPE OF CONSUMER-DRIVEN HEALTH PLAN, HOW WOULD YOU CONVINCE THE EMPLOYEES THAT THE EMPLOYER IS NOT TRYING TO RIP THEM OFF?
ANSWER for Case Study # 1
Case Study # 2
Available Information - An independent retail hardware store chain (12 stores) was established in 1962. The chain covers three counties and is privately owned by two non-related partners. Second generation family is now involved in the business as well. They have grown by locating near developing community subdivisions, and have growing commercial accounts from builders and subcontractors. They have experienced high turnover over the past two years and are concerned about that continuing. The total number of full time employees working for the chain is 164.
They have provided employees with a choice of three different HMO plans and have provided management with two different PPO plans. Rates have been increasing faster than the firm's profit levels over the past two years and they are looking for ways to control this trend. They are willing to consider other benefit plans to help control the turnover problem. They need your help NOW and won't wait for the renewal of what they have in place to make the necessary changes.
ANSWER for Case Study # 2
Case Study # 3
Ace Construction Company has been in business for more than 30 years. The principles are two of the sons of the original owner. The original owner retired several years ago. There are 35 employees mostly construction workers. It is a non-union operation and has one location. However, the workers are living in various parts of one state with a few living out of state. The jobs sites when working are scattered over 4 states. There is office staff, laborers, experienced road crew workers and maintenance personnel who keep the equipment in good shape.
Although the owners are not happy about the annual double-digit increases in the PPO plan, they are not interested in changing their plan. Their families like the low-co-pays under the current plan which is $10 to see a primary doctor, $20 to see a specialist and no co-pays for hospital stays. They have a $6/$10 two tier drug card.
Currently, the employees pay half of all premiums whether single or family. This has caused a burden on the employees and several in recent years have waived coverage and gone on their spouse's plan. There are now only 20 employees left on the plan. The firm got a letter from the carrier that their participation is below requirements and that they need to increase participation within 60 days or the group will be terminated.
You have been referred to this company by one of their suppliers to assist them with their problem. Their current agent has simply encouraged them to contribute more in order to increase participation in the plan.
Since, the owners who are doing financially well and can handle the premium don't want to change their coverage and yet the employees are struggling to pay their share of the premiums what options would you suggest they explore? What additional questions would you ask the benefit manager and owners about their situation? How would you suggest they mitigate their participation problem and keep their premiums down? What benefit improvements might you suggest?
ANSWER for Case Study # 3
THIS CONCLUDES THE FINAL EXAM